中医护理在儿童康复中的特色满意度分析王梦莹

首页 -> 往期阅览-> 2025年

《实用全科护理学》( ISSN3080-7638、EISSN3080-7646 )

发布者：Quest Press

发布日期：2025/10/19

10.12479/questpress-syqkhlx.20250341

Open Access

下载2次

浏览65次

中医护理在儿童康复中的特色满意度分析

王梦莹

玉林市中医医院，广西玉林，537000

摘要：目的研究语言障碍儿童患者实施中医护理时的应用价值。方法纳入2024 年8 月-2024 年12月，我院就诊的语言障碍儿童患者50 例，分组方式以平行信封抽签形式开展，分别采用中医护理（观察组，n=25）及常规护理（对照组，n=25）开展干预，比较两组患者满意度和语言功能评分。结果观察组护理满意率高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组护理前语言功能指标无明显差异（P>0.05），护理后差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论语言障碍儿童患者实施中医护理时，满意度显著，可提升语言功能，值得后续临床推广。
关健词：中医护理；语言障碍；康复训练

Analysis of the Satisfaction of Traditional Chinese Medicine Nursing in Children's Rehabilitation

Mengying Wang
Yulin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yulin Guangxi 537000, China

Abstract: Objective To study the application value of traditional Chinese medicine nursing in children with language disorders.Methods From August 2024 to December 2024, 50 children with language disorders who visited our hospital were included.The grouping was conducted by parallel envelope randomization.The children were divided into the observation group (n=25)receiving traditional Chinese medicine nursing and the control group (n=25) receiving conventional nursing. The satisfaction and language function scores of the two groups were compared. Results The satisfaction rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in language function indicators before nursing between the two groups (P>0.05), but there was a statistically significant difference after nursing (P<0.05). Conclusion Traditional Chinese medicine nursing for children with language disorders is highly satisfactory and can improve language function, making it worthy of further clinical promotion.
Keywords : Traditional Chinese Medicine Nursing; Language Disorders; Rehabilitation Training

论文收录证明 / 文献检索报告

Document Retrieval Certificate / Proof of Publication Indexing

作者贡献声明 / 贡献确认书

Author Contribution Statement / Certificate of Authorship Contribution

同行评审报告 / 评审意见

Peer Review Report / Peer Review Comments

利益冲突

Conflict of Interest

作者声明不存在任何利益冲突。

The author declares no conflict of interest.

本文采用知识共享“署名 4.0 国际”许可 (CC BY 4.0) 进行许可。许可协议详情请访问： https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). For details of the license, please visit:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.