ISSN 3080-7638(Print)
ISSN 3080-7646(Online)
版权信息

ISSN 3080-7638(Print)
ISSN 3080-7646(Online)
CODEN:SQHAA7
(国际标准连续出版物标识符·
全球唯一标识符)
分配机构:美国化学文摘社(CAS)

编委会
主编
郑永波
同行评议专家

副主编
徐爱芳/南通市第二人民医院
马燕/广西贺州市人民医院
黄美莹/贵州工商职业学院
李佳怡/姜晨/张海洋
蒋惠如/杨毅宁/冯智博
汪亚坤/王菡侨/李波
(以上排名不分先后顺序)
编委
 
编委会助理
周鹏
期刊主页
在线投稿
申请编委/副主编/同行评议专家
索引/检索/存档
DOI
ICI World of Journals
哥白尼索引期刊数据库(波兰)

EuroPub
欧洲学术出版中心数据库(英国)

巴西联邦政府
LivRe(科学在线图书馆)

Open Access Library(OALib)
开放存取资源图书馆

RCCSE中国学术期刊收录(武大)
ESJI欧亚科学期刊索引(哈萨克斯坦)
KIND CONGRESS KC
Research Bible
Sci Online
Baidu Baike 
Editing and Publishing
Quest Press Limited
Address
7th Floor,D, No.19,Palawak
Lane, Macau
Telephone
+853 6881 9699
Email
QuestPress@hotmail.com
Web site
http://qkhl.scionline2025.com/
 

  首页 -> 往期阅览-> 2025年
《实用全科护理学》( ISSN3080-7638、EISSN3080-7646 ) 发布者:Quest Press 发布日期:2025/10/19
10.12479/questpress-syqkhlx.20250315 Open Access 下载1 浏览16

 

FAST HUGS BID质检理念在气管插管机械通气患者中的护理效果及对机械通气时间的影响

邵敏   张香军   赵艳玲   仝晓鑫
河南黄河门峡医院,河南三门峡,472000
摘要:目的 分析FAST HUGS BID 质检理念在气管插管机械通气患者中的护理效果及对机械通气时间的影响。方法 选取2024 年1 月-2024 年12 月我院收治气管插管机械通气患者80 例,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各40 例。对照组采用常规护理干预,观察组采用FAST HUGS BID 质检理念的护理干预。对比两组患者护理效果、机械通气时间、住院时间和患者护理满意度。结果 观察组护理效果优于对照组,P<0.05;观察组机械通气时间、住院时间均比对照组短,P<0.05;观察组患者护理满意度高于对照组,P<0.05。结论 FAST HUGS BID 质检理念的护理干预具有良好的护理效果,减少机械通气时间、住院时间,提高患者护理满意度。
关健词:FAST HUGS BID;气管插管;机械通气
 
Nursing Care and Outcomes of the FAST HUGS BID Concept in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Endotracheal Intubation and Its Association with Ventilation Duration
Min Shao   Xiangjun Zhang   Yanling Zhao   Xiaoxin Tong
Henan Huanghe Sanmenxia Hospital, Sanmenxia, Henan 472000, China
Abstract: Objective To analyze the nursing effect of the FAST HUGS BID quality control concept in patients with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation and its impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation. Methods Eighty patients receiving mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation, admitted to our hospital from January 2024 to December 2024, were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 40 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing intervention, while the observation group received nursing intervention based on the FAST HUGS BID quality control concept. The nursing outcomes, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction with nursing care were compared between the two groups. Results The nursing outcomes in the observation group were superior to those in the control group (P < 0.05). The duration of mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction with nursing care in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The nursing intervention based on the FAST HUGS BID quality control concept demonstrates favorable nursing outcomes, reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay, and improves patient satisfaction with nursing care.
Keywords:FAST HUGS BID; Endotracheal Intubation; Mechanical Ventilation
 
 
 
  Peer Review
同行评审
Editorial Services
编辑服务
Research Ethics Policy
研究伦理政策
Contributorship & Authorship
贡献者与署名
About Quest Press / Macau Sino Int. Med. Press
关于 Quest Press 与 Macau Sino Int. Med. Press
  Global Indexing
全球索引
Copyright Licensing
版权许可
Data Sharing Policy
数据共享政策
Appeal/Correction/Retraction
申诉/更正/撤回
  Online Submission
线上投稿
To the Librarian
致图书馆员
Open Access Statement
开放获取声明
Misconduct Handling Policy
处理不端行为政策
  Content Licensing
内容许可
Guidelines for Reviewers
审稿人指南
Quality Control Mechanism
质量把控机制
Academic Misconduct Screening Policy
学术不端筛查政策
  Advertising Policy
广告政策
Article Processing Charge (APC)
文章处理费
Publication Ethics Policy
出版伦理政策
Call for Editorial Board Members/Associate Editors/Peer Reviewers/Editors-in-Chief
诚邀编委、副主编、同行评审专家及主编