ISSN 3080-7638(Print)
ISSN 3080-7646(Online)
版权信息

ISSN 3080-7638(Print)
ISSN 3080-7646(Online)
CODEN:SQHAA7
(国际标准连续出版物标识符·
全球唯一标识符)
分配机构:美国化学文摘社(CAS)

编委会
主编
郑永波
同行评议专家

副主编
徐爱芳/南通市第二人民医院
马燕/广西贺州市人民医院
黄美莹/贵州工商职业学院
李佳怡/姜晨/张海洋
蒋惠如/杨毅宁/冯智博
汪亚坤/王菡侨/李波
(以上排名不分先后顺序)
编委
 
编委会助理
周鹏
期刊主页
在线投稿
申请编委/副主编/同行评议专家
索引/检索/存档
DOI
ICI World of Journals
哥白尼索引期刊数据库(波兰)

EuroPub
欧洲学术出版中心数据库(英国)

巴西联邦政府
LivRe(科学在线图书馆)

Open Access Library(OALib)
开放存取资源图书馆

RCCSE中国学术期刊收录(武大)
ESJI欧亚科学期刊索引(哈萨克斯坦)
KIND CONGRESS KC
Research Bible
Sci Online
Baidu Baike 
Editing and Publishing
Quest Press Limited
Address
7th Floor,D, No.19,Palawak
Lane, Macau
Telephone
+853 6881 9699
Email
QuestPress@hotmail.com
Web site
http://qkhl.scionline2025.com/
 

  首页 -> 往期阅览-> 2025年
《实用全科护理学》( ISSN3080-7638、EISSN3080-7646 ) 发布者:Quest Press 发布日期:2025/10/19
10.12479/questpress-syqkhlx.20250307 Open Access 下载1 浏览11

 

“乐龄智护”531 微培训模式对老年人健康知识保留率的影响

曾蕾
联勤保障部队第九二八医院,海南海口,571159
摘要:目的 探讨基于微学习理念设计的“乐龄智护”531 微培训模式对提升老年人健康知识掌握水平及长期保留率的效果。方法 采用随机对照试验设计,将120 名老年患者随机分为干预组(n=60,接受“531 微培训”)和对照组(n=60,接受传统健康讲座)。通过基线调查、即时后测和干预后1 个月、3 个月的延迟后测,比较两组在健康知识得分、保留率、用药依从性及满意率上的差异。结果 即时后测显示,干预组知识得分(88.45±5.12)显著高于对照组(82.10±6.78)(t=7.893, P<0.01)。延迟后测中,干预组知识保留率(1 个月96.3%,3 个月94.5%)显著高于对照组(91.8%,85.4%)(P<0.05)。干预后3 个月,干预组MMAS-8 得分(6.95±0.82)显著高于对照组(5.80±1.24)(P<0.01),且干预组满意率(95.0%)显著高于对照组(81.7%)(P<0.05)。结论 “乐龄智护”531 微培训模式能有效提升老年人健康知识的即时掌握度和长期保留率,其碎片化、高频次、强互动、情景化的特点更符合老年人的认知规律和学习习惯,是一种优于传统健康教育模式的创新策略。
关健词:老年人;健康素养;微培训;知识保留率;健康教育;乐龄智护
 
The Impact of the "Happy Age Smart Care" 531 Micro-training Model on the Retention Rate of Health Knowledge among the Elderly
Lei Zeng
The 928th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force, Haikou Hainan 571159, China
Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of the "Happy Age Smart Care" 531 micro-training model, designed based on the micro-learning concept, on improving the health knowledge acquisition level and long-term retention rate of the elderly. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted, with 120 elderly patients randomly divided into an intervention group (n=60, receiving "531 micro-training") and a control group (n=60, receiving traditional health lectures). Baseline surveys, immediate post-tests, and delayed post-tests at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention were conducted to compare the differences in health knowledge scores, retention rates, medication adherence, and satisfaction rates between the two groups. Results The immediate post-test showed that the knowledge score of the intervention group (88.45 ± 5.12) was significantly higher than that of the control group (82.10 ± 6.78) (t = 7.893, P < 0.01). In the delayed post-tests, the knowledge retention rate of the intervention group (96.3% at 1 month and 94.5% at 3 months) was significantly higher than that of the control group (91.8% at 1 month and 85.4% at 3 months) (P < 0.05). Three months after the intervention, the MMAS-8 score of the intervention group (6.95 ± 0.82) was significantly higher than that of the control group (5.80 ± 1.24) (P<0.01), and the satisfaction rate of the intervention group (95.0%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (81.7%) (P < 0.05). Conclusion The "Happy Age Smart Care" 531 micro-training model can effectively enhance the immediate acquisition and long-term retention of health knowledge among the elderly. Its characteristics of fragmentation, high frequency, strong interaction, and contextualization are more in line with the cognitive patterns and learning habits of the elderly, making it an innovative strategy superior to traditional health education models.
Keywords:Elderly; Health literacy; Micro-training; Knowledge retention rate; Health education; Happy Age Smart Care
 
 
 
  Peer Review
同行评审
Editorial Services
编辑服务
Research Ethics Policy
研究伦理政策
Contributorship & Authorship
贡献者与署名
About Quest Press / Macau Sino Int. Med. Press
关于 Quest Press 与 Macau Sino Int. Med. Press
  Global Indexing
全球索引
Copyright Licensing
版权许可
Data Sharing Policy
数据共享政策
Appeal/Correction/Retraction
申诉/更正/撤回
  Online Submission
线上投稿
To the Librarian
致图书馆员
Open Access Statement
开放获取声明
Misconduct Handling Policy
处理不端行为政策
  Content Licensing
内容许可
Guidelines for Reviewers
审稿人指南
Quality Control Mechanism
质量把控机制
Academic Misconduct Screening Policy
学术不端筛查政策
  Advertising Policy
广告政策
Article Processing Charge (APC)
文章处理费
Publication Ethics Policy
出版伦理政策
Call for Editorial Board Members/Associate Editors/Peer Reviewers/Editors-in-Chief
诚邀编委、副主编、同行评审专家及主编