ISSN 3080-7638(Print)
ISSN 3080-7646(Online)
版权信息

ISSN 3080-7638(Print)
ISSN 3080-7646(Online)
CODEN:SQHAA7
(国际标准连续出版物标识符·
全球唯一标识符)
分配机构:美国化学文摘社(CAS)

编委会
主编
郑永波
同行评议专家

副主编
徐爱芳/南通市第二人民医院
马燕/广西贺州市人民医院
黄美莹/贵州工商职业学院
李佳怡/姜晨/张海洋
蒋惠如/杨毅宁/冯智博
汪亚坤/王菡侨/李波
(以上排名不分先后顺序)
编委
 
编委会助理
周鹏
期刊主页
在线投稿
申请编委/副主编/同行评议专家
索引/检索/存档
DOI
ICI World of Journals
哥白尼索引期刊数据库(波兰)

EuroPub
欧洲学术出版中心数据库(英国)

巴西联邦政府
LivRe(科学在线图书馆)

Open Access Library(OALib)
开放存取资源图书馆

RCCSE中国学术期刊收录(武大)
ESJI欧亚科学期刊索引(哈萨克斯坦)
KIND CONGRESS KC
Research Bible
Sci Online
Baidu Baike 
Editing and Publishing
Quest Press Limited
Address
7th Floor,D, No.19,Palawak
Lane, Macau
Telephone
+853 6881 9699
Email
QuestPress@hotmail.com
Web site
http://qkhl.scionline2025.com/
 

  首页 -> 往期阅览-> 2025年
《实用全科护理学》( ISSN3080-7638、EISSN3080-7646 ) 发布者:Quest Press 发布日期:2025/10/19
10.12479/questpress-syqkhlx.20250337 Open Access 下载1 浏览16

 

基于赋能理论的中青年卒中偏瘫患者自我管理干预研究

朱红霞
十堰市太和医院,湖北十堰,442000
摘要:目的 探究基于赋能理论的中青年卒中偏瘫患者自我管理干预效果。方法 将2023 年6 月至2025年1 月我院收治的62 例中青年卒中偏瘫患者,随机分为观察组、对照组,各31 例。对照组、观察组分别实施常规管理干预、基于赋能理论的自我管理干预。结果 在脑卒中知识掌握率方面,观察组为96.77%,对照组为80.65%,观察组明显高于对照组,有统计学意义(P<0.05);在自我管理行为依从性方面,观察组为96.77%,对照组为77.42%,观察组明显高于对照组,有统计学意义(P<0.05);在患者的生活质量方面,观察组精神健康、躯体功能、心理功能以及情感职能分别为(74.64±3.13)分、(73.74±3.71)分、(72.97±3.82)分、(73.83±2.83)分,观察组明显优于对照组,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 实施基于赋能理论的自我管理干预在中青年卒中偏瘫患者中,能帮助患者通过具体场景加深对知识的理解与记忆,让知识真正内化为自身认知的一部分,帮助患者长期保持对脑卒中知识的清晰认知,最终提升整体知识掌握率,减少因障碍无法解决而放弃的情况,保障行为的持续性与依从性,值得参考。
关健词:赋能理论;中青年;卒中;偏瘫;自我管理
 
Research on Self-Management Intervention for Young and Middle-Aged Stroke Patients with Hemiplegia Based on the Enablement Theory
Hongxia Zhu
Taihe Hospital of Shiyan City, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China
Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of a self-management intervention based on the enablement theory in young and middle-aged stroke patients with hemiplegia. Methods Sixty-two young and middle-aged stroke patients with hemiplegia admitted to our hospital between June 2023 and January 2025 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 31 patients in each group. The control group received routine management intervention, while the observation group received a selfmanagement intervention based on the enablement theory. Results Regarding the mastery rate of stroke knowledge, the observation group was 96.77%, significantly higher than the control group's 80.65%, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Regarding compliance with self-management behaviors, the observation group was 96.77%, significantly higher than the control group's 77.42%, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). In terms of patients' quality of life, the scores for mental health, physical function, psychological function, and emotional role in the observation group were (74.64 ± 3.13), (73.74 ± 3.71), (72.97 ± 3.82), and (73.83 ± 2.83) points, respectively, which were significantly better than those in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion Implementing the self-management intervention based on the enablement theory in young and middle-aged stroke patients with hemiplegia can help patients deepen their understanding and memory of knowledge through specific scenarios, truly internalizing the knowledge as part of their own cognition. This helps patients maintain a clear understanding of stroke knowledge in the long term, ultimately improving the overall knowledge mastery rate, reducing the likelihood of abandonment due to unresolved obstacles, and ensuring the sustainability and compliance of behaviors. It is worthy of reference.
Keywords:Enablement theory; Young and middle-aged; Stroke; Hemiplegia; Self-management
 
 
 
  Peer Review
同行评审
Editorial Services
编辑服务
Research Ethics Policy
研究伦理政策
Contributorship & Authorship
贡献者与署名
About Quest Press / Macau Sino Int. Med. Press
关于 Quest Press 与 Macau Sino Int. Med. Press
  Global Indexing
全球索引
Copyright Licensing
版权许可
Data Sharing Policy
数据共享政策
Appeal/Correction/Retraction
申诉/更正/撤回
  Online Submission
线上投稿
To the Librarian
致图书馆员
Open Access Statement
开放获取声明
Misconduct Handling Policy
处理不端行为政策
  Content Licensing
内容许可
Guidelines for Reviewers
审稿人指南
Quality Control Mechanism
质量把控机制
Academic Misconduct Screening Policy
学术不端筛查政策
  Advertising Policy
广告政策
Article Processing Charge (APC)
文章处理费
Publication Ethics Policy
出版伦理政策
Call for Editorial Board Members/Associate Editors/Peer Reviewers/Editors-in-Chief
诚邀编委、副主编、同行评审专家及主编